Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I would like to speak in favour of this amendment. All of these issues are inextricably intertwined, and it's very important that we consider them all.
It is fully in keeping with the spirit of the House amendment. It should be noted that we cannot reduce the scope of the House amendment. Whatever we do here can only expand it, so if you find that the wording in the House motion is stronger, then that is what shall prevail.
Really, the true scope of the study is going to be determined by the witnesses we call, which is really up to all of us, and the questions we ask of those witnesses. There's no reason for that to dilute the results of this study. The analysts are very adept at extracting the information that is presented to us by the various witnesses. Then we, of course, are fully able to put forward our recommendations as well.
Having said that, I have no problem with supporting Mr. MacGregor's amendment, should he wish to amend Ms. Damoff's amendment.