With what you're saying—and what I'm trying to confirm—do you think that the Russians, in order to create disinformation, fear and confusion, will sometimes claim responsibility for attacks even if they weren't involved in the attack? Is that a form of disinformation that we need to watch out for?
Do we just take it at face value when they say that they've done an attack, or is it still important to do an attribution to confirm whether or not they are indeed the source of the attack?