Yes, if you look at the United Kingdom last year, it expelled three spies posing as journalists working in the U.K. It revealed that there was an agent of the Chinese state, Christine Lee, who was giving generous donations to certain politicians who then, one presumes in response, would be representing the interests of China over the interests of their own country.
We've seen in the United States much more concern about the leak of high-tech technologies that would facilitate a dual-use military technology or technologies that would facilitate cyber-espionage out of universities. Canada has not responded to things like the Australian Strategic Policy Institute's report that revealed that there were researchers of the People's Liberation Army working in sensitive areas of high tech at Canadian universities. They had entered Canada under false pretences by not revealing their status as military officers, and it goes on.
Why didn't we do more about the Michael Chan matter in Ontario? CSIS said he had frequent contacts with the Chinese consul general, but we don't know what they were talking about. It's important for Parliament to know.