Thank you, Chair.
I'm going to start with Dr. Paquin. You made a remark about NATO and article 5 that I'd like to clarify. It seems to me—perhaps I heard you incorrectly—that you said article 5 could be used to justify a response to an attack on us. My understanding of article 5 is not that it would justify a response by us for an attack on us, but it would require us to respond to an attack on one of the other NATO members.
Are you suggesting that, by a cyber-attack on one of our NATO allies, we would be required to respond via article 5?