From my perspective, I think there is a little more leeway than perhaps Dr. Davies sees.
The reason I say this is that we have to pay attention to other parts of the context. When we leave content out there, who's paying? It's the communities that are targeted. It isn't a zero-cost game. We have to think about what not doing things means for the capacity of members of marginalized communities to actually function in society and to contribute meaningfully.
I also think we have to pay attention to the fact that social media, while it is certainly not ideal for dealing with public values, social media platforms, in fact, are making decisions about content every single day. Their terms of service reserve every right to them about what kinds of decisions they are going to make. There's very little transparency and accountability on that.
It isn't as if they are not already doing this. They are. It's just that we don't have good information as a public to understand what the basis is upon which these decisions are being made.
We also have to recognize—