There are two aspects to that. There's what we can do before people get radicalized and what we can do after people get radicalized. There are already fairly robust intervention services within the country. Obviously, these could be improved, and public safety is working towards that.
But I think it's important that there are already existing resources in the community, whether they be social workers or psychologists, or even school counsellors, who have the ability to intervene in these situations, but they don't have the cultural nuance and cultural sensitivity training to deal with that particular population. Rather than build whole programs with dedicated individuals like psychologists, I think a lot could be done with empowering local resources that already exist and giving them the training they need to do that.
On the prevention side, I think there's a huge gap in primary prevention. When we talk about primary prevention, we're not talking about individuals. We're talking about addressing communities and building resilience that helps to inoculate them against the.... These are not ideologically specific services or programs, but programs that create a resilience in young people or older people so that they are less likely to be drawn in by these seductive ideologies.