As I stated in the letter that I wrote...and I do have notes also from that day. I have notes from April 20 that were disclosed to the Mass Casualty Commission and the federal DOJ that I haven't seen yet publicly, but I do have notes. As I stated, it was a feeling of disgust. I was embarrassed to be a part of it. I was embarrassed to be listening to it and message received, I understood exactly what was being said.
With regard to the latter part of your question, I don't know the act specifically, but I just think it's important, yes, that it be examined. There needs to be a level of independence so that from the selection process all the way through there's a very different...a mandate letter. Keeping our partners informed or providing information to the Minister of Public Safety or the minister 's office, that's very different from interfering, influencing or exerting pressure.
I think that words need to be carefully examined, and if it's vague, we should be more specific so that we're never in this situation again, especially those on the ground who are dealing with the investigation.