I ask the question because, as elected representatives, we get comments and expressions of fear from people who are in favour of firearms and others who support increased gun control. It isn't easy to read legislation. It may contain parts that are unclear or hard to understand.
The document your department has given us states that manufacturers and retailers may continue selling airsoft guns but that they'll have to alter their appearance so they don't look like modern firearms. That reminds me of the measure introduced in the United States requiring orange tips to be added to replicas to distinguish them from actual firearms.
Is that the kind of measure we're indirectly proposing? If manufacturers decide to produce guns that don't look exactly like firearms, they won't be classified as prohibited firearms under the bill. Is that what we're to understand?