When there is a protection order that's imposed on an individual, the chief firearms officer.... Oh, I'm sorry. That's a different one.
In one of the proposed sections, if the chief firearms officer “determines” that there was domestic abuse or stalking, they need to revoke the licence. That is a really good thing, but because we have some provinces now that have appointed chief firearms officers with the explicit mandate to protect gun owner rights, we feel that allowing one individual to determine this is too subjective, and it could be strengthened by inserting a more reasonable standard. If the CFO, for example, receives information that any reasonable person would consider to be a case of domestic violence, then he should revoke the licence.