First of all, you need to read the American Journal of Public Health study, because that study also showed that a woman who owns a firearm for protection is less likely to be killed.
That was a cross-sectional study, and those are the weakest studies of all. It was also an American study done on American women. My studies are not cross-sectional. They are quasi-experimental studies. They are time-series studies. They have a control and an experimental effect.
I have looked at spousal homicide and have looked at the legislation with those studies, and there's been no reduction in spousal homicide with any of that legislation or the prohibition of firearms. In the last 10 years, looking at some of the evidence, maybe 0.01% of firearms owners have their licences confiscated for domestic reasons, so I don't expect there to be any effect from the legislation you are proposing.
In terms of adolescent suicide, once again, it's a cross-sectional study. You may have heard about cross-sectional studies showing that drinking more wine causes cancer or drinking more wine does not cause cancer. They conflict with each other all the time. It's because they don't have proper controls and they have confounders. You need to look at the better studies. Those are the ones I'm talking about that are like the quasi-experimental studies that I do.
I have done studies on youth suicide and firearm legislation in terms of prohibition, storage and so on, and none of those studies have shown that there is a reduction in overall youth suicide rates after the implementation of legislation or the confiscation of firearms.