I think there are a few holes that could be plugged in the system.
I'll give you an example. During the PAL application process, you have to provide two references from people who have known you for two years or longer. If you're married or common-law, then your spouse has to sign off on your ability to own and use firearms. Ninety per cent of those references are never called. We did an ATIP on that.
In my opinion, one of the most important aspects of that application process is the human intelligence. You're asking someone if they're okay with their applicant friend having a firearms licence. That aspect of the system that already exists is not being used.
That's a really great example. We could call 100% of all applicant references for probably $2 million or $4 million a year, but we won't do that. We won't even use that to see if that works. Remember, only a tiny fraction of these guns are ever domestically sourced for criminal behaviour anyway. We won't do even that tiny fraction. We want to ban handguns instead, because it's ideological, as we've seen.