You have said that mass shootings in Canada, which include Polytechnique, Concordia, Dawson, Moncton, Fredericton, Edmonton, Vernon, the Quebec mosque, Penticton, Burk's Falls and Nova Scotia are just a small number of anomalies and outliers and that you don't legislate to prevent such tragedies unless you're an irrational zealot.
Is it your position that it's not worth trying to limit access to weapons that are commonly used in mass shootings because there are fewer such victims compared with other such gun crimes?