Let's back up here.
Mr. Chiang was moving it, which implicitly means that I considered it to be in order. Mr. Lloyd expressed a problem with that. I know you mentioned earlier that you had concerns about whether or not this amendment was admissible; therefore, I explicitly made a ruling—which is the chair's prerogative—that it is, in fact, in order, in my opinion. That's my prerogative.
I understand your perspective. The decision has been challenged by Mr. Lloyd. We have a motion before us on whether or not to sustain the decision of the chair.
Mr. MacGregor is next, I believe.
We seem to be entering into debate. We'll have a very brief....
We're not going to debate this. The chair has ruled.