However, that's not what this.... I know that's what you're trying to say it says.
This has caused fear in the firearms community, because there is no restriction on magazines. You do not need a licence to buy a magazine. Virtually every single manufacturer of the firearms we talked about—semi-automatic with detachable magazines—also makes magazines for the same model. They might be sold in different countries, but they make detachable magazines designed to go into that gun. That's what they are designed to do. Therefore, they meet your criterion of “designed to accept a detachable...magazine”.
Why would we put such ambiguous language in the legislation and create this problem? I simply don't trust the wording in this clause at all. Neither does any other hunter in this country who has a semi-automatic firearm.