Getting back to personal defence, I articulated in my opening remarks numerous scenarios of people who are in the outdoors and who currently would not have to seek any permission to use their non-restricted shotguns or rifles, like a Tavor chambered in .308. Is there anything in this legislation...?
Let's face it: If you have an employee who's working in a dangerous situation, you as an employer have a responsibility to provide your employees with all of the safety equipment that's necessary for them to conduct their duties safely. We've seen this in the RCMP, as a matter of fact. The RCMP lost a case for not providing the right equipment to their members.
Is there any provision in the legislation or the proposed amendments for people who work in dangerous industries in which they're proximal to wildlife or have been charged with the protection of other people? Are there any exemptions for them for any of the firearms they currently use right now? Is there a permitting path? Is there a way for them to get an exemption so that they can continue to use the firearms they purchased for the purpose of personal protection, or will their firearms that are now slated to go to the prohibited list go to the prohibited list, and it's too bad, so sad—go buy a different gun? What's the approach?