Actually, I'm just referring to G-4 and this last firearm.
In answer to the question from the member, the onus is really on the government that's putting forward this legislation and the amendments included to really prove its case, without a shadow of a doubt, that certain firearms are not included on the list.
That's what I'm trying to do today. I'm trying to give Canadians a good impression, based on expert testimony at the end of the table, of whether they will be. It's speculative, but based on that definition, they certainly could be. Talking about the capacity opens up a whole bunch of firearms that are not in G-46 but certainly will be included as a result of the paragraph 84(1.2)(g) proposed by G-4.
Let me keep going.