Okay. Thank you very much.
I'm very much questioning the way the government decided to proceed and this famous list. I wonder if it would have been easier for everyone to proceed differently.
In 1994, the United States adopted a fairly clear definition of what constitutes a prohibited firearm. It's both a good and a bad example, because that definition has been watered down a bit by a fairly long list of exclusions.
Was this approach one of the options the government considered, rather than listing the models in a schedule and expanding the Firearms Act by hundreds of pages?