Frankly, that's something that's beyond my control.
My understanding is that the lists are now public. They've been released by the chair, I believe. People can peruse the lists themselves. They are relatively lengthy.
What I can say is that in my interactions with members of the public on the classification of firearms, they generally find favour with the concept of firearms being listed explicitly in lists, because they can look them up and see them in black and white, as opposed to having to interpret a statute. That isn't to say that everyone is in favour of that. That's generally what I've heard.
I guess the lists that are here are rather lengthy. It probably requires a bit more effort than in the past to go through them.