I just have a clarification on how the rest of the meeting is going to roll, so if the clerk and the chair can weigh in, and perhaps other members if there are any other plans.... Again, the Conservatives just found out about this minutes before the meeting was scheduled to start. We're just processing the magnitude of this as well.
Mr. Chair, I have a question for clarification and then just a follow-up comment. If this is moved, this unanimous consent motion, if we all provide UC and the Liberal motion to withdraw G-4 and G-46 is passed, it would mean that G-4 would be completely withdrawn and that G-46, the long list, would not be moved at any point. That's the clarification I need.
Following that, my understanding is that we would return to the debate on the 106(4) motion originally brought forward at the last meeting by Ms. Michaud to call for testimony—which was quite a long time ago—and we were debating that. The Conservatives wanted 20 meetings and travel. There was a lot of back-and-forth, and I believe we settled on a subamendment from Mr. MacGregor to the 20-meeting amendment, which said eight meetings and travel.
Just so I'm clear, if this passes, G-4 is withdrawn, G-46 will not be moved and we resume debate on witness testimony of those very amendments that are going to be withdrawn. Then we will resume the debate of what those meetings would look like, if any. Is that correct?