Thank you.
In my view, you need a combination. You establish the principle in the legislation, and you provide the list. As I said, we have a firearms reference table that was developed many years ago. I don't know if it's been kept up to date, but even though Internet access may be a problem, I think there are easier mechanisms to allow gun owners to search and find out how their gun is categorized.
I think we need both the list for the specificity and the language in the legislation to articulate the principle that we're not addressing guns reasonably used in hunting. We're looking at centrefires, semi-automatics that were designed to accept a large-capacity magazine or that have other military characteristics, which is consistent with definitions in many countries around the world.