Sure.
As I mentioned, we reviewed the list of the new firearms that will be affected by this definition and identified about 115 or 117 that are currently unrestricted. That means those 117 firearms are perhaps currently used for hunting, because they have not been restricted or prohibited in the past. Certainly those firearms require some additional scrutiny.
We've observed with sniper rifles—for example, the Ruger Mini-14—that there are unrestricted firearms not reasonably used for hunting that have been unrestricted simply because of failures to address gaps in the legislation. I think the only legitimate arguments that can be brought forward relate to that set of firearms. There may be a different approach required for them.
I want to underscore that we have seen, as you heard from other witnesses, many cases of people posing with their hunting rifles and saying, “This law is impeding my livelihood” or whatever, and on further investigation it's clear that the firearm is not in fact caught up in this definition or on the list.