To answer your question, I have to look at the context for each of those cases.
For safe storage, I definitely take the same position. We were talking just now about remote regions, among other things, where sometimes people have to defend themselves against dangerous animals. In fact, a woman and her child were killed in those circumstances a few years ago.
For restrictive measures, which involve just seizing firearms owned by an individual, and registries and various licences, I would say absolutely, yes.
If we contextualize what you are putting to me in its entirety, the way that the use of firearms is restricted and the fact that they are not recognized in the history of crime in Canada, on that part, I entirely agree. That does not mean that firearms regulation is not still necessary in order for the industry, the business, and the various activities associated with them to function properly.