Okay. That's interesting. It seems like it's not actually an objective decision based on evidence that this is a threat to public safety, that this is causing fatalities or that this is being used by crime. It seems like the decision to include this specific classification in the definition is purely based on subjective values and the belief that these firearms should not be in Canada, but we don't have any objective evidence that they actually have posed a threat to Canadians.
In terms of airsoft, it was also very interesting. I know I only have a little bit of time. Most varieties of airsoft guns cannot really be converted into real firearms. Is that correct?
For the vast majority of airsoft guns, it would be very prohibitive for anyone to convert those into a real firearm. Is that correct?