I will go to my suggestion then.
Just to wrap up that point, it would provide a lot of clarity to Canadians who own those firearms if they knew that those were not being banned, and it's the minister's fault that he connected those two things yesterday in the announcement, just to be clear. The Liberal members do have an opportunity right now to denounce or to assure that these aren't being banned, but they have chosen not to.
I will go on to suggest that—Mr. Chair, you could confirm this—if we have unanimous consent to park this, we can actually get to the rest of the bill, and we can come back to this clause. We can get started on the other clauses, ghost guns and other things. I don't think there are a lot of issues forthcoming in other clauses.
Conservative members obviously have more questions about this and about the announcement yesterday. It may give me an opportunity to speak with the minister, or perhaps another technical briefing would come. When we do get back to this clause, if we decide to park it for a minute, that could go more quickly.
Again, we're very hesitant. The track record of the Liberals has not built trust concerning these new types of definitions, so we are hesitant. In the rest of the bill, the amendments don't look too bad. I don't think there will be any issues there.
I could put forward a motion that we pause this clause for now, and we can come back to it. We could get going on the rest of the bill. I could put forward a motion if there is willingness. If there's not, then I won't waste your time.