I'll go back to the fact that the Conservatives have still not talked about CPC-3, which is the amendment in front of us. Perhaps they should have moved to delete the whole clause, because that's what they seem to be debating.
CPC-3 says that only an immediate family member or someone who resides with a person is able to get a court order. I wonder if the Conservatives could explain to the committee, in CPC-3, why they feel that only immediate family members should be eligible and not, for example, a woman whose ex-partner is stalking and threatening her. This is the amendment that we have before us.
The Conservatives haven't put forward an amendment to delete clause 4. That's all they've talked about.
The amendment says that it's only an immediate family member. Could they perhaps speak to their amendment and explain to the committee why someone who is no longer living with an individual who continues to harass and stalk and threaten them should not be part of the bill?