The amendment actually has the same consequence, but I'm asking about the test to have a protection order granted versus the test that has to be met in a court of law to convict somebody. Those are different tests.
I'm wondering if you can just tell me—I sincerely don't know—what the test is that must be met in order for a court to issue a protection order versus a court to issue a guilty verdict, because those are completely different things for which the consequence is the same. I wonder if the consequence meets the tests appropriately.