I'm talking about a transferee and a transferor and a temporary storage. Let me be more clear, if I can.
My colleague Mr. Ruff articulated that this clause, if added into the legislation, would provide clarity and direction to a chief firearms officer, who is under no obligation, as Mr. Mackinnon has just said in answer to my previous question, to grant an ATT to temporarily store a firearm.
If we're trying to reassure the firearm-owning public that, if they want to temporarily store their firearms or their restricted firearms in order to deal with a personal issue, I guess my question would be this: Would the clause that's being discussed here by my colleague Mr. Ruff, that's being presented by Mr. Ruff, not provide more certainty and clarity to a chief firearms officer?