I'm somewhat concerned that this is adding a lot of duplication to the Criminal Code, because it seems to me that a person may transfer a cartridge magazine that is not prescribed to be a prohibited device—so a legal cartridge—only if the individual holds a licence authorizing him or her. I believe we've already passed an amendment that people are required to have a licence to purchase a magazine.
I'm wondering, and maybe the officials could answer here, if there is anything in this amendment that really does anything, considering that we've already passed legislation requiring people to have a licence to purchase these magazines, and presumably to have possession of the magazines as well. It would seem that this is a duplication in the law.