Yes. Actually, that was brought up by the CFO from Alberta when they came to committee, I believe, or maybe when I met with them. I think the number is confidential, but it literally is in the single digits, the number of people across the country who have authorization to carry for personal protection not because of a profession but because their lives are at risk. We're literally talking about a very small number of people who also have to prove that they're competent with the firearm. It's not just anyone who can get this thing. It has a very high bar.
Do you have any insight into why an amendment like this is necessary when the system is not broken? Is there any evidence that the system is broken and would require this change to come in?