I'm sorry. I'm just refreshing myself on some of the provisions here.
In terms of the difference proposed here, it defines the responsibilities of the CFO with respect to issuing an authorization to carry and transport a handgun only for the purposes and use in connection with his or her lawful profession or occupation.
For example, if you were speaking of a trapper, they often carry not just their rifle or shotgun but also sometimes a handgun for personal protection. In that case, it talks about the CFO being designated as being responsible for the issuance of ATCs and ATTs for those purposes. This provision is consistent with amendments to the application process for authorizations to carry in paragraph 54(2)(a) of the act.