It would amend the first paragraph that we adopted yesterday. It will clean it up. It will allow officials to make regulations, but it will also expand who is issuing a protection order.
For the new one, I'll just read the first paragraph, Chair, if that's okay. Everyone has it. It would be that “protection order has the meaning assigned by the regulations (ordonnance de protection); but is intended to include any binding order made by a court or other authorizing entities in the interest of the safety or security of a person; this includes but is not limited to orders that prohibit a person from”.
I'm sorry. I think I might have an old one. Do I? I do.
Could you correct the words? I'm sorry. I took the one that the clerk sent me, but I believe that's not the most recent one.
It's “by a court or other competent authority in the interest of the safety or security of a person”.
I hope colleagues will support that. We've already passed the clause. This is just cleaning it up and making it more effective.