The amendment says that it would be stored for the time necessary for the individual to address a mental illness or similar problem.
The individual's not disclosing that to the chief firearms officer. Is that correct? They're just saying that they want to store the firearm, and then.... I guess the worry I've always had with this—and it's not that I'm not going to support it—is that you have someone making a self-determinations on when they should have a firearm in their possession. One of the things we talked about at length is the risk for someone who has depression or PTSD. The whole reason Mr. Ruff has brought this forward is so that they will seek help.
My concern around this is that you're self-determining when you have a mental illness and when you are healthy enough to get that firearm back. Am I correct in interpreting that?