Okay.
So it would be, “this includes but is not limited to orders that prohibit a person from”.
The way it reads right now, according to what I submitted, it includes but isn't limited to “being in physical proximity” to a person. It just doesn't make sense.
Again, this would be adding “or another competent authority”, and then, at the end, “orders that prohibit a person from”.
As well, at the end, is there standard wording available that regulations would be made based on this? We don't want to take away officials' ability to make regulations, which I understand we've done in this clause.