It would cover all of the authorizations to carry for reasons under paragraphs 20(a) or 20(b).
As it normally works currently, the vast majority of them are for reasons of employment. For example, it's a security guard who carries a handgun for a bank cash transfer company. They have one in Ontario. There's an agreement that happens also, for example, with the Quebec CFOs, so that they can cross over to Gatineau and do their route across there.
There's an agreement. It's still an authorization in the province in which it was issued, currently.
That's what the intent was. It was to capture those situations. However, the way it's worded would limit it in terms of where that person resides. I think the intent would be to maintain the current regime so there is a geographical reality to the authorization to carry.