Thank you.
I'm sorry that I missed answering that last question last time.
In terms of the zero-tolerance policies, it's a pretty basic idea. If a border service agent is found to be in violation of the CHRA—there's discrimination that has taken place on the basis of protected grounds, the rights that are protected in our Constitution—that person does not deserve the power that a border services agent has. We recommend disciplinary measures that are proportionate to the severity of that act.
Second, in terms of resourcing, one concern around the PCRC is, of course, that in order for it to be effective, it needs to be functional and it needs to be resourced properly. That's not only to meet the timelines, but also to take on the kinds of cases we are hoping the PCRC will be able to take on, including the national security cases I was talking about earlier.
Absolutely, I think resourcing is a key question here. If it's not properly resourced, we're going to have the same problems we had with other oversight bodies that became backlogged very quickly. It's simply not fair to make people who are already in vulnerable and precarious positions suffer any longer because of our lack of foresight in terms of the resourcing required to deal with a very big problem in Canada.