I'm just trying to keep up with this. The subamendment moved by Mr. Lloyd does not include language—and this is to Mr. Julian's point—about a study. My amendment says that we're holding a meeting, so I would need clarification on how a meeting automatically becomes a study. If you could quote the exact reference.... I've sat on many committees, and there have been meetings on topics of particular interest, but it does not automatically mean it's a study unless you include specific text in your motion, which is not on the floor as I understand it.
I want clarification from the clerk. Was there an amendment moved or another subamendment moved to make this a study?