I believe it's extremely important for us to be able to address broader issues. As Ms. Michaud just said, the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers was very clear about the fact that there is currently no way of dealing with systemic problems or procedures. Nor is this clearly addressed in the current bill.
The commission already has the power to reject groundless complaints, which I find reassuring. I do not find this problematic.
However, at the moment, the process is not open to people who might be experiencing systemic problems, thus making it impossible to examine these problems.
My view is that the subamendment and the amendment are worth adopting. The only qualification I would add is that they do not provide for addressing Canada Border Services Agency policies or procedures, or the services it provides. In my view and that of some of the witnesses we have heard, the capacity to do so is essential.
To make sure that I have understood correctly, I would like to ask the clerk a question through you, Mr. Chair. I believe you said that if amendment BQ‑3 were adopted, then amendment NDP‑21 could not be moved. Is that correct?