Thank you, Mr. Chair.
The answer given really explains it, but to drive the point home once again, I think that allowing this will put in the legislation that there is the opportunity for this through the act. However, there are regulations and internal processes that still exist that allow for the commission to determine whether it meets an internal threshold.
We need to keep it open, not close off the ability, because you sometimes don't know what situations might arise. I appreciate the Bloc's amendment to this. You want to provide the opportunity in the event there is a situation where it could be of great public interest for an investigation to look at the situation. Limiting the scope in the act limits the flexibility with the commission.
I think this provides that opening. There are still checks and balances in place to ensure that they're not frivolous, and that they're not based on an episode of Border Security, or whatever else is being referenced, but that there is that opportunity and we're not limiting the scope too severely. It's a good balance between keeping it open and allowing for the flexibility to ensure that frivolous complaints are not being filed.