I'm sorry—we were just discussing some potential scenarios.
The question I was asking my colleague was this. Say the Canadian Human Rights Commission were investigating something, or we thought it was more appropriate for them to investigate, this amendment—the first part, the “may”—would allow us the discretion to decide whether it would be better placed with another act of Parliament.
The second part of the NDP amendment is somewhat different from the way it's written here.
With an ongoing investigation, for example, it may be that suspension would be the better thing to do than either being required to refuse or having the discretion to refuse.