Yes, I would be concerned about “seriously compromise” and what that means, but also about what “ongoing investigation” means. Another body is already taking carriage of it and is investigating it, as opposed to the way I read this clause now, which is that the commission would believe it could be dealt with better by another body.
The other body wouldn't be seized with it yet, necessarily, the way it's written in the bill, but with the amendment, it would have to be seized with it and have an ongoing investigation.