Thanks very much.
Dr. Roebuck, I'd like to continue on with what you were just saying.
We know from the surprising testimony of Ms. Kelly that the onus is on the victims. As we've heard from the three very eloquent witnesses today, the trauma involved in producing a victim statement or a victim impact statement is enormous.
The fact that the onus is still on the victims is something I see as a major shortfall in this situation, so I wanted to come back to that issue.
For example, the Correctional Service is not obliged to follow geographic restrictions, despite it being a recommendation or request from a victim. They're not obliged to follow that. In the case of the transfer of Mr. Bernardo's, a horrific serial killer, no notice was given to the victims so that they could actually provide that victim statement and perhaps that geographic restriction.
How do we put in place a system that actually respects victims and puts the onus on the Correctional Services so that victims are truly respected and aren't forced to go through trauma trying to anticipate when and if an inmate may be transferred?