There has to be a clear distinction between indeterminate sentences and people found not criminally responsible. Of course, there's an entirely different regime and review panel that deals with those individuals. It's important that be maintained, but that can't be confused with the indeterminate sentences that come from a dangerous offender application, where the criteria, as you all know, for a dangerous offender is exceptionally high. Often you see it in a situation like we have here, where Mr. Bernardo has been convicted of two accounts of first-degree murder and many other offences, and then, in addition, has been declared a dangerous offender and, therefore, has an indeterminate sentence.
In that sense, the two regimes must be treated completely differently. Quite frankly, if they weren't treated differently, it would be unconstitutional.