Thank you. I'll continue.
The Conservatives are doing the work for me in showing how unserious they are.
Mr. Warnell, I'm going to try to at least get a question on the record. To all our witnesses, we're very interested in amendments. Comments have been made that there are things that can be done to improve this bill, but overall we need a cybersecurity plan to deal with critical infrastructure. We're very open to amendments and having those conversations about where we can strengthen this. However, unless we hear testimony, unless we go through this process, unless there are questions and amendments suggested, we can't propose those amendments to the government. This little demonstration here, this fake outrage, is really disappointing to see, because critical infrastructure is at risk.
Mr. Warnell, I come from a host nuclear community myself, and my residents share the concerns around the risk to critical infrastructure, nuclear, and supply chains. You brought up at the very beginning the risk to cancer patients for the critical isotopes that are produced. Can you perhaps speak to not only critical infrastructure but the upstream of the supply chain, if the immaturity of certain members can't get us through this process to allow amendments and testimony.