We're certainly not suggesting that there be judicial oversight over every aspect of the decision-making process before the decision has been made. Certainly, there needs to be judicial oversight for rights of appeal, rights for the targets of an order to be able to question the order and to challenge whether it's proportional and appropriate.
When the Privacy Commissioner was here, he talked about consultation in terms of making sure that privacy rights were respected. Depending on what aspect of the bill we're looking at, the role of the judiciary will vary. It's all part of what most witnesses are saying. Checks and balances need to be there.