We've obviously taken note of the concerns expressed by the people our colleague referred to. We would expect that, in the work of this committee, if there are amendments that, in your view, answer some of these concerns, of course we would be open to working with the committee and to ensuring that collectively we get the best legislation we can.
We recognize that these are extraordinary powers in many ways that require, as you noted, the appropriate oversight. There is an element of judicial oversight, but we also recognize that the threat landscape is evolving as well and evolving very quickly. According to some of the briefings I have from security officials, including at CSIS, the threat actors, including malicious state actors, are seeking to do some of the damage and disrupt some of these systems that we talked about. We require the ability to move quickly, and we require the ability to help identify potential risks and hopefully prevent incidents from happening. That's why there are these powers, but we recognize that these powers come with an obligation of transparency in every case possible and the appropriate reviews, including judicial reviews.
François-Philippe, you had a point on the judicial review.