First, the powers granted are meant to ensure the security of designated systems. The objective is clear, and it's security. In the event of a cyber attack, which could affect everything from telecommunications and banking to the country's transportation network, you'll understand the urgent need to act.
It's just as urgent to take action when natural disasters strike or, to use the example of Rogers again, when 12 million Canadians don't have access to any payment system in the country.
For all these reasons, we're looking for the right balance. I understand the desire for consultation. Take the example of a cyber attack on 5G technology, which could affect all systems. If we were to publicize the details of the failure involving a player in the industry, this could encourage bad people to pounce on the breach. This would increase the systemic risk.
I think that we're trying to strike this balance. The proposed powers are tied to a clear security objective. Administrative law applies, along with judicial review and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, for example.