Thank you for the good questions.
I can't speak to the CBSA cuts, necessarily, as I don't really have purview over its organizational structure and funding structure, but what I can say is that with the resources it has allocated to outbound inspections, it has always been responsive. It's always been a great partner, understanding, of course, that the priority in recent years has been on inspections of guns and drugs coming into the country.
In our understanding of this complex, multi-faceted problem of auto theft, it's also been a key learning in the past two years that auto theft is funding gun and drug crimes in our communities. The additional funding now put into the CBSA has been welcome, and it is focused on auto theft and ensuring that we have those inspections in place to cut off that funding source. I think that is important.
In terms of analytics and how they help, analytics can look at things such as VIN data—as my colleague Mr. Vording mentioned—container weight, shipping lines, shipper destinations and other non-PII data to target those containers that have red flags, as in the example earlier. It may not be a container of dishwashers, and we can tell that by all of the various data elements that are analyzed.
How we share different trends and intelligence these days is through the MOUs we have in place and our partnerships with law enforcement, and then law enforcement shares that with the CBSA. What we'd like to do is open up that information sharing through an MOU or tri-party agreement, inclusive of the CBSA, such that it can share some of the information off the B13 manifests.