I'll just follow up on that.
I know there are often exceptions for national security and whatnot. How can Canadians trust that, when an exception is laid out in Bill C-26...? This is larger than the conversation about this current proposed section. The minister is given discretion quite often to ensure they can use information if it's related to national security, etc. How can Canadians trust that the right balance is struck? This is a bigger conversation, but I think it will help speed up some of the forthcoming amendments.
Could you outline the processes in place to ensure that privacy is in fact protected and that, when an exemption is laid out in legislation, it's not opening it up for abuse?