Well, I guess we're talking a bit theoretically here.
In the absence of existing structures, a whole bunch of new ways of working had to be developed when the pandemic hit. All kinds of synergies across governmental departments had to be forged. In the urgency of the situation, people rose to the occasion. We were able to set up funding for rapid response research. We were able to be at the forefront of some very important outcomes that helped in Canada and elsewhere. We've also seen a variety of structures and changes come into place postpandemic, based on those learnings.
How exactly would the capstone purport to operationalize in those moments? We're all awaiting those details in the fall economic statement.
I think there's a sense that the time and energy invested in creating ad hoc, cross-governmental bodies to address.... It was a health emergency that time. It could be a climate change emergency next time. Maybe the forest fires are another example. We want a one-door, one-stop shop, going forward, where that interstitial tissue is already there and being strengthened through each successive major challenge.