Ultimately, that presentation.... For whatever that person could get, they had to come up with a methodology beforehand. They had to have a purpose and a scientific basis for doing the research. That was what the funding was based on, not the peer review. The peer review would be based on what the report is and whether the report was a valid study, after the fact. The money was given beforehand, which is a waste of taxpayers' dollars, if that's the case. It's given out before there's any understanding of it.
Ms. Evans, do you have any comments?